From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?B?RGF2aWQgTnlzdHLDtm0=?= <david.c.nystrom-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: compile error in fedora19
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:50:10 +0200
Message-ID: <521B16C2.2010400@gmail.com>
References: <CAHO6xe8BQ9b9UM-ECCf1E0y4T2TDoSG0b9UrramHZow+jVn-tg@mail.gmail.com>
 <16204110.8Pd7xlAD8U@x220>
 <CAHO6xe_h+14hedQJG9GpNAF83o+5T_+3yT-_oCQTxWJ2u2ojMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5466413.XGg3uDHj8f@x220> <521B1399.3030600@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <521B1399.3030600-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>

On 08/26/2013 10:36 AM, David Nystr=C3=B6m wrote:
> On Sat 24 Aug 2013 03:58:59 PM CEST, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 24/08/2013 05:44, Nulik Nol :
>>> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>>> I've sent some patches which are still waiting for review.
>>>> Anybody (including you) may review them.
>>>
>
> <snip>
>
>> I understand you haven't tested them. Could you test please ?
>
> Built cleanly on Ubuntu 13.10, 3.11.0-2-generic, which is 3.11-rc5.
>
> As for a review, I can reply to the original patch, however,
> check your GCC 4.8 build fix patch, you are only comparing the first
> character of
> buf and string_elt_strs[i].result.
> Is this the intended result ?
>

Arrgh,

Never mind this, missed a parathesis. its OK.

Br,
David