From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:05:31 +0100
Message-ID: <5280552.ziep6B5itu@xps>
References: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE23F512773@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <1773388.o8hTKI9FYH@xps>
 <CADNuJVr0A0R5OdnKRHEwgFjy2ynKqB48h9pyeo453U+ze75bCA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
 Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>, "Dumitrescu,
 Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>, "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>,
 Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>,
 Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>, "Zhang,
 Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>, Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
 "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>, "O'Hare,
 Cathal" <cathal.ohare@intel.com>, "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Jay Rolette <rolette@infinite.io>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209B53195
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:05:35 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <CADNuJVr0A0R5OdnKRHEwgFjy2ynKqB48h9pyeo453U+ze75bCA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

25/01/2019 17:53, Jay Rolette:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:40 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Jay,
> >
> > 25/01/2019 14:42, Jay Rolette:
> > > >    * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree.
> > > >      Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of
> > > >      testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested.
> > >
> > > We do @ infinite io.
> >
> > Would you be OK to share your test plan and the results please?
> 
> I thought Intel was asking if anyone was using the LTS tree (ie., is it
> worthwhile to continue maintaining and testing it). We don't test DPDK as a
> standalone entity. We have test plans and such for our product, which
> includes DPDK, but nothing that would be of interest elsewhere.

OK

> Sorry if I misunderstood the original question.

No, I misunderstood your reply :)