From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Armin Steinhoff Subject: i210 performance ? Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:51:20 +0100 Message-ID: <5281EC08.9060408@steinhoff-automation.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" Hi All, after porting Intel's Data Plan to QNX 6.5 I'm doing some performance test with "testpmd". I'm using a single i210 board installed on a dual core QNX 6.5 machine and using "testpmd" as a packet generator (UDP packets). The test are done with: start: testpmd -c 3 -n -> interactive mode by default set burst 1 set fwd txonly start stop Without a delay between packets I see a huge number of dropped packets. After introducing a delay of 60us after sending the "packet burst" dropping of packets doesn't happen. My questions are: why dropps the i210 packets ? Is it because of the fact that probably all send descriptors are occupied ? Best Regards Armin Steinhoff