From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier MATZ Subject: Re: [memnic PATCH] pmd: use memory barrier function instead of asm volatile Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:52:39 +0100 Message-ID: <52EB7267.3060004@6wind.com> References: <1390579157-23890-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <7F861DC0615E0C47A872E6F3C5FCDDBD0102D11D@BPXM14GP.gisp.nec.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" To: Hiroshi Shimamoto Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7F861DC0615E0C47A872E6F3C5FCDDBD0102D11D-ZmjkEB1lVlLt6d3pZDjeaEtBU8KWyXPq@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" Hi Hiroshi-san, On 01/30/2014 12:42 PM, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [memnic PATCH] pmd: use memory barrier function instead of asm volatile > > By the way, I was also asked to use rte atomic function > instead of cmpxchg asm statement. > My re-submitted version in dpdk-ovs has such a change. > What do you think? Yes I agree about this change. Regards, Olivier