dev.dpdk.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] eal_common_cpuflags: Fix %rbx corruption, and simplify the code
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:47:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533099FB.5030702@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140324195206.GG19368-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org>

On 03/24/2014 12:52 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
>>
> To add an extra sanity check in rte_get_flag_enabled.  If we were moving to the
> use of C99 initalizers, I wanted something to catch the possibility that we skip
> a flag by accident (i.e. leave a zero initalized hole in the array).  Except 0
> from my read is a valid value for all the fields of the array.  So I bumped up
> the cpuid register enum by one and wrapped it in a macro.  That way we can test
> for !feat->reg as an indicator that we're requesting feature support for a flag
> thats not listed in the array.

It actually isn't: there aren't any flags in CPUID leaf 0, so since the
code only looks for bits it'd be perfectly okay to reject leaf 0.

Another thing that I noted is that the code doesn't actually check that
any particular leaf is valid (by checking the maximum leaf number in
CPUID leaf 0xXXXX0000:EAX).  Especially for the leaf 7 features this
could result in false positives, which obviously would be disastrous.

	-hpa

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-24 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1395330830-1310-1-git-send-email-hpa@linux.intel.com>
     [not found] ` <1395330830-1310-1-git-send-email-hpa-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-20 16:39   ` [RFC UNTESTED PATCH] eal_common_cpuflags: Fix %rbx corruption, and simplify the code Neil Horman
     [not found]     ` <20140320163921.GC7721-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-20 17:02       ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-03-20 18:04       ` Neil Horman
     [not found]         ` <20140320180443.GE7721-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-20 18:59           ` Neil Horman
2014-03-21 14:49       ` [PATCH v2] " Neil Horman
     [not found]         ` <1395413340-27392-1-git-send-email-nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-21 15:03           ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]             ` <532C54C6.2060202-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-21 17:48               ` Neil Horman
     [not found]                 ` <20140321174839.GB21998-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-24 11:18                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-03-24 17:44       ` [PATCH v3] " Neil Horman
     [not found]         ` <1395683088-19687-1-git-send-email-nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-24 18:09           ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]             ` <533074F0.3060204-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-24 19:52               ` Neil Horman
     [not found]                 ` <20140324195206.GG19368-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-24 20:47                   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
     [not found]                     ` <533099FB.5030702-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-25 10:41                       ` Neil Horman
2014-03-25 17:03       ` [PATCH v4] " Neil Horman
     [not found]         ` <1395767000-28709-1-git-send-email-nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-25 17:06           ` Chris Wright
2014-03-25 17:37           ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-25 19:52       ` [PATCH v5] " Neil Horman
     [not found]         ` <1395777179-4345-1-git-send-email-nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-25 20:51           ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]             ` <5331EC38.2070901-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-02 11:16               ` Neil Horman
     [not found]                 ` <20140402111643.GB6974-0o1r3XBGOEbbgkc5XkKeNuvMHUBZFtU3YPYVAmT7z5s@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-02 11:53                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-04-02 12:42               ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=533099FB.5030702@linux.intel.com \
    --to=hpa-vuqaysv1563yd54fqh9/ca@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).