From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier MATZ Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/11] ixgbe/mbuf: add TSO support Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 23:49:45 +0200 Message-ID: <536D4D79.4080609@6wind.com> References: <1399647038-15095-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <20140509100431.7af69959@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140509100431.7af69959-We1ePj4FEcvRI77zikRAJc56i+j3xesD0e7PPNI6Mm0@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" Hi Stephen, On 05/09/2014 07:04 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > I would also like to propose changing the checksum offload flags. > Many devices can indicate good checksum in some cases but can't test > for many other types of packets. By changing the flags to be: > PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD and PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD > > It is then possible to support devices where some cases (IPv4 + TCP) > are supported but others are not. I agree. That's also what I'm talking about in the commit log of the patch 08/11. If there is not much rework for all the patches, I think it's feasible to include this kind of modification in the v2 of this series. Regards, Olivier