From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent JARDIN Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] dpdk: Allow for dynamic enablement of some isolated features Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 16:57:56 +0200 Message-ID: <53DBAAF4.4030608@6wind.com> References: <20140730210920.GB6420@localhost.localdomain> <20140731131351.GA20718@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <5766264.li3nkTmgY6@xps13> <20140731143228.GB20718@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20140731181032.GC20718@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20140731183631.GC6420@localhost.localdomain> <20140731195829.GG17560@tuxdriver.com> <20140731202042.GB28495@localhost.localdomain> <20140731203200.GH17560@tuxdriver.com> <53DB53E9.6040004@6wind.com> <20140801140654.GB31979@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Neil Horman Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140801140654.GB31979-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On 01/08/2014 16:06, Neil Horman wrote: > Thats a multi year effort, and not something I'm prepared to even > consider undertaking. Sorry: I am not pushing you, it was just an open comment. I do agree that it is a multi year effort to get it down into a wide "agreed" community. DPDK community cannot manage it.