From: Franck Baudin <franck.baudin-kQLz4VG1Jc7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Xie,
Huawei" <huawei.xie-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"Gray,
Mark D" <mark.d.gray-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Thomas Monjalon
<thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org"
<dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>,
"dpdk-ovs-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org"
<dpdk-ovs-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Wrong TCP checksum of packets sent by Linux guest (virtIO/vhost)
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:12:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <540721E8.2010307@qosmos.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B0F284EE2-0J0gbvR4kThpB2pF5aRoyrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
Hi,
On 09/03/14 13:13, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> Looping in the dpdk-ovs list.
>
> * Does the new vhost API allow a user to know if all the relevant offloads have
> been
> turned on/off for that interface? It seems that this is possible through the
> virtio_net
> structure but it would be good to get some feedback from the relevant person
> working on DPDK (Huawei?).
>
> * If this is the case, then it is probably in the realm of the vswitch do the actual
> checksum (for VM-VM) or correctly configure the NIC when sending out through
> the physical interface.
>
> Comments?
>
> Mark:
> So far not supported. This is important as well in VxLan case. For the packet flow
> Guest A-> virtio -> ..->OVDK->.. -> Guest B.
> 1) If guest A and B are on different host machines, say A and B respectively, and if the nic on A supports
> vxlan checksum offload, then both guest and host needn't generate checksum, the nic will
> generate checksum for both inner and outer packet.
> 2) In VM2VM case, as it is trusted communication channel, could we negotiate with the guest tcp stack not to verify checksum
> for received packet?
The problem is that any TCP packet send by a vanilla Linux guest through
vhost is incorrect (VM to anything, including other colocalied VMs). In
other words, the VM cannot use TCP. QEMU options and ethtool -K csum off
tso off ("TCP stack negociation") have no effect, maybe because the
vhost backend is misbehaving.
Franck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-03 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-02 13:20 Wrong TCP checksum of packets sent by Linux guest (virtIO/vhost) Franck BAUDIN
[not found] ` <D84D5A6C1B26E448A0F35B539111D0E721D8C0-tjtCPadWEHp5RdiqnJbviwvhXHaN8uqmQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-02 13:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-09-02 14:37 ` Franck Baudin
2014-09-03 10:00 ` Gray, Mark D
[not found] ` <738D45BC1F695740A983F43CFE1B7EA92D72308F-kPTMFJFq+rFP9JyJpTNKArfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-03 11:13 ` Xie, Huawei
[not found] ` <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B0F284EE2-0J0gbvR4kThpB2pF5aRoyrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-03 14:12 ` Franck Baudin [this message]
[not found] ` <540721E8.2010307-kQLz4VG1Jc7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-03 16:07 ` Gray, Mark D
2014-09-04 2:54 ` Xie, Huawei
2014-09-03 16:15 ` Gray, Mark D
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=540721E8.2010307@qosmos.com \
--to=franck.baudin-kqlz4vg1jc7qt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dpdk-ovs-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=huawei.xie-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.d.gray-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).