Re: [PATCH] add free hugepage function

[Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

On 2014/10/29 13:26, Qiu, Michael wrote:
> 在 10/29/2014 11:46 AM, Matthew Hall 写道:
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:27:58AM +0000, Qiu, Michael wrote:
>>> I just saw one return path with value '0', and no any other place 
>>> return a negative value,  so it is better to  be designed as one
>>> non-return function,
>>>
>>> +void
>>> +rte_eal_hugepage_free(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct hugepage_file *hugepg_tbl = g_hugepage_table.hugepg_tbl;
>>> +	unsigned i;
>>> +	unsigned nr_hugefiles = g_hugepage_table.nr_hugefiles;
>>> +
>>> +	RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, "unlink %u hugepage files\n", nr_hugefiles);
>>> +
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_hugefiles; i++) {
>>> +		unlink(hugepg_tbl[i].filepath);
>>> +		hugepg_tbl[i].orig_va = NULL;
>>> +	}
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Michael
>> Actually, I don't think that's quite right.
>>
>> http://linux.die.net/man/2/unlink
>>
>> "On success, zero is returned. On error, -1 is returned, and errno is set 
>> appropriately." So it should be returning an error, and logging a message for 
>> a file it cannot unlink or people will be surprised with weird failures.
> 
> Really need one message for unlink failed, but I'm afraid that if it
> make sense for return an error code when application exit.
> 
> Thanks
> Michael
>> It also had some minor typos / English in the comments but we can fix that too.
>>
>> Matthew.
>>
> 
> 
> 
Agree.May be it is not need to return error?
-- 
Regards,
Haifeng