From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] i40e: Add floating VEB support for i40e Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 12:05:23 +0200 Message-ID: <5451199.uFSMMCI1h5@xps13> References: <1458895321-21896-1-git-send-email-zhe.tao@intel.com> <1464110886-9504-1-git-send-email-zhe.tao@intel.com> <20160524122221.421bf2eb@xeon-e3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Zhe Tao , jingjing.wu@intel.com To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1196F5677 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 12:05:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id n129so56050359wmn.1 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 03:05:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160524122221.421bf2eb@xeon-e3> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-05-24 12:22, Stephen Hemminger: > kvargs are a very awkward API to use in a portable application. > Good for Intel testing NIC's bad for DPDK users. Yes. The alternative would be to have some driver-specific API. We can live with devargs until driver API is introduced.