From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pernas Maradei Subject: Re: White listing a virtual device Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 15:01:23 +0000 Message-ID: <545CDEC3.7090308@emutex.com> References: <545CBCE0.2030806@emutex.com> <20141107140201.GE25469@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <545CD710.4040406@emutex.com> <1697795.zFSsGeXbRQ@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1697795.zFSsGeXbRQ@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On 07/11/14 14:57, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > OK, now I better understand your need. > I think that your use case was simply forgotten when designing the > new behaviour. > Could you prepare a patch for this need? > Or maybe you could workaround with a script based on lspci to blacklist all > network devices? Hi Thomas, Thanks for your reply. That explains it then. I'll try to put a patch together the following week. Thanks, Nico.