From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linhaifeng Subject: Re: some questions about rte_memcpy Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:32:04 +0800 Message-ID: <54C08B54.50700@huawei.com> References: <54C070DF.1050006@huawei.com> <20150122044531.GA13230@mhcomputing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" To: Matthew Hall Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150122044531.GA13230-Hv3ogNYU3JfZZajBQzqCxQ@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On 2015/1/22 12:45, Matthew Hall wrote: > One theory. Many DPDK functions crash if they are called before rte_eal_init() > is called. So perhaps this could be a cause, since that won't have been called > when working on a constant Hi, Matthew Thank you for your response. Do you mean if call rte_memcpy before rte_eal_init() would crash?why? -- Regards, Haifeng