From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Panu Matilainen Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal: add missing symbol export for rte_eal_iopl_init() Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:24:29 +0200 Message-ID: <54E4A09D.3030202@redhat.com> References: <3056549e6665c8dd2e22199fb92ec983f9e4b8eb.1424269040.git.pmatilai@redhat.com> <54E49FFC.6040804@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54E49FFC.6040804-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On 02/18/2015 04:21 PM, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote: > On 18/02/2015 14:17, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Panu Matilainen >> --- >> lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map | 1 + >> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map >> b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map >> index d36286e..5ed6e4d 100644 >> --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map >> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map >> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ DPDK_2.0 { >> rte_eal_has_hugepages; >> rte_eal_hpet_init; >> rte_eal_init; >> + rte_eal_iopl_init; >> rte_eal_lcore_role; >> rte_eal_mp_remote_launch; >> rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore; >> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map >> b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map >> index d36286e..5ed6e4d 100644 >> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map >> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map >> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ DPDK_2.0 { >> rte_eal_has_hugepages; >> rte_eal_hpet_init; >> rte_eal_init; >> + rte_eal_iopl_init; >> rte_eal_lcore_role; >> rte_eal_mp_remote_launch; >> rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore; > Duplicated of http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/3234/ ? Yup, a dupe it is. Probably also saw your patch at the time as I had a slight sense of dejavu with this, but thought such a trivial thing would've been applied already... - Panu -