From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa-AlSX/UN32fvPDbFq/vQRIQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/14] eal_pci: Add flag to hold kernel
	driver type
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:29:43 +0900
Message-ID: <54E5E547.2020806@igel.co.jp>
References: <1424060073-23484-12-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
 <1424314187-25177-1-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
 <1424314187-25177-3-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp>
 <5677937.pUHUTuZF0f@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
To: michael.qiu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Return-path: <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <5677937.pUHUTuZF0f@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>

On 2015/02/19 20:17, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> @@ -152,6 +159,7 @@ struct rte_pci_device {
>>  	uint16_t max_vfs;                       /**< sriov enable if not zero */
>>  	int numa_node;                          /**< NUMA node connection */
>>  	struct rte_devargs *devargs;            /**< Device user arguments */
>> +	enum rte_pt_driver pt_driver;		/**< Driver of passthrough */
> [...]
>> +static int
>> +pci_get_kernel_driver_by_path(const char *filename, char *dri_name)
> I think "kernel driver" is a good name. Why not using this name in the
> pci_device struct to be more consistent?

Hi Michael,

Could you please let me know what do you think about it?

Thanks
Tetsuya

> Thanks