From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vlad Zolotarov Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:14:17 +0300 Message-ID: <552BCF39.3010502@cloudius-systems.com> References: <1427743271-14448-1-git-send-email-vladz@cloudius-systems.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258214130CC@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258214130CC-pww93C2UFcwu0RiL9chJVbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On 03/31/15 14:47, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Vlad Zolotarov >> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 8:21 PM >> To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD >> >> This series adds the missing flow for enabling the LRO in the ethdev and >> adds a support for this feature in the ixgbe PMD. There is a big hope that this >> initiative is going to be picked up by some Intel developer that would add the LRO support >> to other Intel PMDs. >> >> The series starts with some cleanup work in the code the final patch (the actual adding of >> the LRO support) is going to touch/use/change. There are still quite a few issues in the ixgbe >> PMD code left but they have to be a matter of a different series and I've left a few "TODO" >> remarks in the code. >> >> The LRO ("RSC" in Intel's context) PMD completion handling code follows the same design as the >> corresponding Linux and FreeBSD implementation: pass the aggregation's cluster HEAD buffer to >> the NEXTP entry of the software ring till EOP is met. >> >> HW configuration follows the corresponding specs: this feature is supported only by x540 and >> 82599 PF devices. >> >> The feature has been tested with seastar TCP stack with the following configuration on Tx side: >> - MTU: 400B >> - 100 concurrent TCP connections. >> >> The results were: >> - Without LRO: total throughput: 0.12Gbps, coefficient of variance: 1.41% >> - With LRO: total throughput: 8.21Gbps, coefficient of variance: 0.59% >> >> This is an almost factor 80 improvement. >> >> New in v9: >> - Move newly added IXGBE_XXX macros to ixgbe_ethdev.h. >> >> New in v8: >> - Fixed the structs naming: igb_xxx -> ixgbe_xxx (some leftovers in PATCH2). >> - Took the RSC configuration code from ixgbe_dev_rx_init() into a separate >> function - ixgbe_set_rsc(). >> - Added some missing macros for HW configuration. >> - Styling adjustments: >> - Functions names. >> - Functions descriptions. >> - Reworked the ixgbe_free_rsc_cluster() code to make it more readable. >> - Kill the HEADER_SPLIT flow in ixgbe_set_rsc() since it's not supported by >> ixgbe PMD. >> >> New in v7: >> - Free not-yet-completed RSC aggregations in rte_eth_dev_stop() flow. >> - Fixed rx_bulk_alloc_allowed and rx_vec_allowed initialization: >> - Don't set them to FALSE in rte_eth_dev_stop() flow - the following >> rte_eth_dev_start() will need them. >> - Reset them to TRUE in rte_eth_dev_configure() and not in a probe() flow. >> This will ensure the proper behaviour if port is re-configured. >> - Reset the sw_ring[].mbuf entry in a bulk allocation case. >> This is needed for ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs(). >> - _recv_pkts_lro(): added the missing memory barrier before RDT update in a >> non-bulk allocation case. >> - Don't allow RSC when device is configured in an SR-IOV mode. >> >> New in v6: >> - Fix of the typo in the "bug fixes" series that broke the compilation caused a >> minor change in this follow-up series. >> >> New in v5: >> - Split the series into "bug fixes" and "all the rest" so that the former could be >> integrated into a 2.0 release. >> - Put the RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT definition at the beginning of rte_ethdev.h. >> - Removed the "TODO: Remove me" comment near RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT. >> >> New in v4: >> - Remove CONFIG_RTE_ETHDEV_LRO_SUPPORT from config/common_linuxapp. >> - Define RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT in rte_ethdev.h. >> - As a result of "ixgbe: check rxd number to avoid mbuf leak" (352078e8e) Vector Rx >> had to get the same treatment as Rx Bulk Alloc (see PATCH4 for more details). >> >> New in v3: >> - ixgbe_rx_alloc_bufs(): Always reset refcnt of the buffers to 1. Otherwise rte_pktmbuf_free() >> won't free them. >> >> New in v2: >> - Removed rte_eth_dev_data.lro_bulk_alloc and added ixgbe_hw.rx_bulk_alloc_allowed >> instead. >> - Unified the rx_pkt_bulk callback setting (a separate new patch). >> - Fixed a few styling and spelling issues. >> >> Vlad Zolotarov (3): >> ixgbe: Cleanups >> ixgbe: Code refactoring >> ixgbe: Add LRO support >> >> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 9 +- >> lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h | 3 + >> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 11 + >> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h | 13 + >> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 765 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h | 6 + >> 6 files changed, 738 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-) >> >> -- > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev for 2.1 release. Thomas, could u consider applying this, please. thanks, vlad > >> 2.1.0