From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zoltan Kiss Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:15:06 +0100 Message-ID: <553F6BBA.20607@linaro.org> References: <1429610122-30943-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725821420BD6@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <553A1D3B.5040400@linaro.org> <2639290.qsn6Cf59vz@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2639290.qsn6Cf59vz@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On 27/04/15 18:38, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-04-24 11:38, Zoltan Kiss: >> On 22/04/15 12:59, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: >>> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org] >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:57 AM >>>> The first objective of this series is to fix the support of indirect >>>> mbufs when the application reserves a private area in mbufs. It also >>>> removes the limitation that rte_pktmbuf_clone() is only allowed on >>>> direct (non-cloned) mbufs. The series also contains some enhancements >>>> and fixes in the mbuf area that makes the implementation of the >>>> last patches easier. >>> >>> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev >> >> When does this series get merged? > > It was acked on April 22 and your question was 2 days later on April 24. > Does it mean you are expecting it to be merged the day it is acked? I was just curious about when to expect it, so I can plan to do some further work based on it, but nothing pressing. Regards, Zoltan > Or do you fear the merging because of a local dev you are working on? > Anyway, everybody seems happy with this version so it's going to be merged. >