From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas F Herbert Subject: Re: performance issue with ovs + dpdk2.0 with vhost Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 10:01:00 -0400 Message-ID: <5555FC1C.2020202@gmail.com> References: <4E5A07CF014F73489C60025F5BCB7834EBC15D9C@RCHEXMBP1.fnc.net.local> Reply-To: thomasfherbert@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: therbert@redhat.com To: dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mail-qg0-f53.google.com (mail-qg0-f53.google.com [209.85.192.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFD43775 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 16:01:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by qgew3 with SMTP id w3so11030211qge.2 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 07:01:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E5A07CF014F73489C60025F5BCB7834EBC15D9C@RCHEXMBP1.fnc.net.local> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 5/15/15 9:55 AM, Rao, Ravi wrote: > Hi All, > I am trying to get a Guest VM connected to the dpdkvhost interface on a host which has the ovs running from the latest ovs git and dpdk2.0. Looks like I am missing something as 95% of traffic is not getting to the VM. Can one of you please let me know which mailing list I should be posting the details for getting a resolution. Is it this dpdk list OR would it be the openvswitch list? You could also try the openvswitch discuss list but this list is a good starting point. I am working with vhost/dpdk2.0 and ovs and others are too. Could you please send more details about what you are seeing? > Regards, > Ravi.. -- Thomas F. Herbert