From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B202FEA830 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 08:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663924028F; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 09:17:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from fout-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.148]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0336C4028E for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 09:17:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from phl-compute-03.internal (phl-compute-03.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A1CEC024A; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 04:17:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-04 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-03.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 25 Mar 2026 04:17:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1774426661; x=1774513061; bh=GmMMKNbAmMhaS6G+zw9JwUH39M5ELsMItzOAroxmwIY=; b= h1p1ayeJyZIDM5W5ocum0ERgNRtzvlYTdWQkrzvllOk8ChxYtkSUsfkQn9U/g61F 96QDQUwBSz29negV2UIkqqsv2apKYIvpq16Son0Q9eXYwURWVg7QKm/ox9t6F46D bD/5PIx1pzn4utpwQXHsOEg4mrL3jOBoeeM5SAfcnrg6taiLbzH18MSwHZP/EjRc zV4EvuuvYttkJ3+/BYllbZuijNqdfOOl0/UqU6DRpAAHA9bFfQjbRY79SiVI/+fu CmDCzIkUYo7ddnb3bWJDq3CDEu/HXXjBK3WXazhzJdvH7vB5S+CNDxCBmWUeJ9ud ylmC9KeYQ8cV8YB9mQkRHQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1774426661; x= 1774513061; bh=GmMMKNbAmMhaS6G+zw9JwUH39M5ELsMItzOAroxmwIY=; b=I JGemlAL46ZMM2S8A9kY+JWzle4yZgwRdoy0ZR3WWd36VF4jcwqVqTD0QGBDyGrTO ir8IzNpuRtpwuHsQCebh+SaXuOdQ9O2njUAlmVT07eVPYVjLBxnqqyB8muu9fy4v pQ59kuNSQtZBggWxbcr/D39LRD9CaFLrMPiNbxGaHZOFk1Yl+zTDbV2slhfMVgqE Ncky38eh46I76kLLbUEsy92znNZWddMO1ij0+76JLVcwPU9y3km1xVbgkB2VV04E Xo1MT8UQFjuqlOzEjdUvhufma/QPZnOKAbodFzudpsDb1VPzn3stA4SUaboTRJTp HjKn2O5x+l+WqrXYJ50DQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgdefvdefleeiucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeegtddtleejjeegffekkeektdejvedtheevtdekiedvueeuvdeiuddv leevjeeujeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedukedp mhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtoheprhgvvghmrgdrshhhrghrmhgrsehrrg guihhshihsrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepuggvvhesughpughkrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthht ohepghgrkhhhihhlsehmrghrvhgvlhhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepuggrvhhiugdrmh grrhgthhgrnhgusehrvgguhhgrthdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehsthgvphhhvghnsehn vghtfihorhhkphhluhhmsggvrhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegrnhgrthholhihrdgsuh hrrghkohhvsehinhhtvghlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepjhgrtghkrdgsohhnugdqphhr vghsthhonhesfhhoshhsrdgrrhhmrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepfhgrnhiihhgrnhhgrd hoshhssehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepkhgrihdrjhhisehinhhtvghlrdgt ohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 04:17:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Reema Sharma Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "gakhil@marvell.com" , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , "stephen@networkplumber.org" , "anatoly.burakov@intel.com" , "jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com" , "gakhil@marvell.com" , "fanzhang.oss@gmail.com" , "kai.ji@intel.com" , Prakash Durgapal , Pratap Rana , Vijay Kumar Mahto , Jaydipkumar Dhameliya , "Liu1, Kai" , "Zhang, Liheng" , "Xiong, Tanghong" , Mattias =?UTF-8?B?UsO2bm5ibG9t?= Subject: Re: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11 Compilation Errors Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 09:17:36 +0100 Message-ID: <5559422.aeNJFYEL58@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hello, If I understand well, you hit 2 issues while compiling a C++ app linked wit= h DPDK? Could you share the exact version of your compiler? =46or rte_bitops.h, if disabling these macros is OK for you, go with it for= now. We will need to understand what happens exactly with __RTE_BIT_OVERLOAD mac= ros. =46or rte_cryptodev.h, it may be hiding an issue somewhere else. Please could you share the exact error message? 25/03/2026 07:55, Reema Sharma: > Hi Team, >=20 > Could you please review the attached DPDK patch (dpdk-24.11_patch_for_cry= pto.patch) and confirm whether the applied fixes are acceptable from the DP= DK perspective? > Your guidance on the correct fix, if any changes are needed, would help u= s proceed with CU compilation. > Kindly share an update at your earliest convenience. > Thanks & Regards, > Reema Sharma > ________________________________ > From: Xiong, Tanghong > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2026 3:26 PM > To: Zhang, Liheng ; Reema Sharma ; Liu1, Kai > Cc: Prakash Durgapal ; Pratap Rana ; Vijay Kumar Mahto ; Jaydipkumar= Dhameliya > Subject: RE: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11= Compilation Errors >=20 >=20 > Thanks Liheng, >=20 > Just got other info that, you can contact DPDK directly through this mai= l: dev@dpdk.org, but the response may be slow. >=20 >=20 >=20 > BRs, >=20 > Tanghong >=20 >=20 >=20 > From: Zhang, Liheng > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2026 5:51 PM > To: Reema Sharma ; Xiong, Tanghong ; Liu1, Kai > Cc: Durgapal, Prakash ; Pratap Rana ; Vijay Kumar Mahto ; Jaydipku= mar Dhameliya > Subject: RE: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11= Compilation Errors >=20 >=20 >=20 > Yes, there is a file =E2=80=9CMAINTAINERS=E2=80=9D in the DPDK root path. >=20 > The file list all the contactor for all dpdk libraries. >=20 > You can search and contact the person for crypto issue. >=20 > If you can=E2=80=99t find it, please let me know, I can forward to you. >=20 >=20 >=20 > From: Reema Sharma > > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2026 5:45 PM > To: Zhang, Liheng >= ; Xiong, Tanghong >; Liu1, Kai > > Cc: Durgapal, Prakash >; Pratap Rana >; Vijay Kumar Mahto >; Jaydipkumar Dhameliya > > Subject: Re: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11= Compilation Errors >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hi Zhang, Liheng, >=20 > We have verified the behaviour on CU side and confirmed that this is not = caused by our code. The issue appears to be related to a DPDK bug. >=20 > At the moment, we do not have any contact information for the DPDK mainta= iners. > Could you please check internally and share the relevant maintainer detai= ls or forward this issue on behalf of Radisys? >=20 > Thanks & Regards, >=20 > Reema Sharma >=20 > ________________________________ >=20 > From: Zhang, Liheng > > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2026 2:49 PM > To: Xiong, Tanghong >; Reema Sharma >; Liu1, Kai > > Cc: Prakash Durgapal >; Pratap Rana >; Vijay Kumar Mahto >; Jaydipkumar Dhameliya > > Subject: RE: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11= Compilation Errors >=20 >=20 >=20 > The e-mail below is from an external source. Please do not open attachmen= ts or click links from an unknown or suspicious origin. >=20 > Hi Reema >=20 > Looks the changes are ok, but you need verify them by compiling your code. >=20 > As I know, the following are the better procedures for DPDK bug fix: >=20 > 1. Please first confirm the error are not related to your own code bef= ore changing DPDK code; > 2. If it is real DPDK bug, you need contact the according DPDK maintai= ner to fix it; > 3. Finally DPDK maintainer will provide an official patch; >=20 >=20 >=20 > From: Xiong, Tanghong > > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2026 3:52 PM > To: Reema Sharma >; Liu1, Kai >; Zhang, Lihe= ng > > Cc: Durgapal, Prakash >; Pratap Rana >; Vijay Kumar Mahto >; Jaydipkumar Dhameliya > > Subject: RE: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11= Compilation Errors >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hello Reema, >=20 >=20 >=20 > Sorry for late reply, copy @Zhang, Liheng = here for comment, thanks Liheng in advance. >=20 >=20 >=20 > BRs, >=20 > Tanghong >=20 >=20 >=20 > From: Reema Sharma > > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2026 1:41 PM > To: Xiong, Tanghong >; Liu1, Kai > > Cc: Durgapal, Prakash >; Pratap Rana >; Vijay Kumar Mahto >; Jaydipkumar Dhameliya > > Subject: Re: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11= Compilation Errors >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hi Xiong, Tanghong/ Liu1, Kai, >=20 > Hope you are doing well. >=20 > I am writing to check if there is any update on the pending DPDK issue ra= ised in this mail. > Could you please share the latest status, or let me know if any additiona= l inputs are required from my side to help move this forward? >=20 > Looking forward to your response. >=20 > Thanks & Regards, >=20 > Reema Sharma >=20 > ________________________________ >=20 > From: Reema Sharma > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2026 11:27 AM > To: Xiong, Tanghong >; Liu1, Kai > > Cc: Prakash Durgapal >; Pratap Rana >; Vijay Kumar Mahto >; Jaydipkumar Dhameliya > > Subject: Request for Review of Fixes Applied for DPDK 24.11 and 25.11 Com= pilation Errors >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hi Xiong, Tanghong/ Liu1, Kai, >=20 > While compiling the CU with DPDK 24.11 and DPDK 25.11, we encountered the= following two errors: >=20 > 1. Conflicting type definitions in the DPDK header file rte_bitops.h >=20 > [cid:image001.png@01DCAD92.9C6111F0] >=20 > 1. =E2=80=9Ctemplate with C linkage=E2=80=9D error in the DPDK header = file rte_cryptodev.h >=20 > To proceed with our CU compilation, we applied the required fixes in the = respective DPDK include files and generated a patch named dpdk-24.11_patch_= for_crypto.patch. The updated changes are included in the attached patch fi= le for your review. >=20 > Could you please review these changes from the DPDK side and confirm whet= her they are acceptable, or advise on the correct fix if modifications are = required? >=20 > Thanks & Regards, > Reema Sharma >=20