From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gyumin <hkm73560@gmail.com>
Subject: Why doesn`t test-acl work when IP filed is
	RTE_ACL_FIELD_TYPE_RANGE?
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:41:04 +0900
Message-ID: <5580DE40.3060704@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: dev@dpdk.org
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-pd0-f176.google.com (mail-pd0-f176.google.com
 [209.85.192.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97128C342
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 04:45:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pdbki1 with SMTP id ki1so27521504pdb.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 19:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.10.52] ([122.49.119.83])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pp6sm2745204pbb.79.2015.06.16.19.45.14
 for <dev@dpdk.org>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Tue, 16 Jun 2015 19:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

hi,

I ran test-acl without any modification and it worked well, and I 
modified test-acl like below:
     {
         //.type = RTE_ACL_FIELD_TYPE_MASK,
         .type = RTE_ACL_FIELD_TYPE_RANGE,
         .size = sizeof(uint32_t),
         .field_index = SRC_FIELD_IPV4,
         .input_index = RTE_ACL_IPV4VLAN_SRC,
         .offset = offsetof(struct ipv4_5tuple, ip_src),
     },
     {
         //.type = RTE_ACL_FIELD_TYPE_MASK,
         .type = RTE_ACL_FIELD_TYPE_RANGE,
         .size = sizeof(uint32_t),
         .field_index = DST_FIELD_IPV4,
         .input_index = RTE_ACL_IPV4VLAN_DST,
         .offset = offsetof(struct ipv4_5tuple, ip_dst),
     },


    static int
    parse_ipv4_net(const char *in, uint32_t *addr, uint32_t *mask_len)
   {
     uint8_t a, b, c, d, m;

     GET_CB_FIELD(in, a, 0, UINT8_MAX, '.');
     GET_CB_FIELD(in, b, 0, UINT8_MAX, '.');
     GET_CB_FIELD(in, c, 0, UINT8_MAX, '.');
     GET_CB_FIELD(in, d, 0, UINT8_MAX, '/');
     //GET_CB_FIELD(in, m, 0, sizeof(uint32_t) * CHAR_BIT, 0);
     GET_CB_FIELD(in, m, 0, 4294967295, 0);

     addr[0] = IPv4(a, b, c, d);
     mask_len[0] = m;

     printf("m[%d]\n", m);

     return 0;
   }

test-acl didn`t match any rules when I ran modified test-acl. Here are 
my rule and trace file:
cat rule1.range
  @192.168.0.1/100 192.168.0.0/24 400 : 500 0 : 52 6/0xff
cat trace1
  0xc0a80005 0xc0a80009 450 53 0x06

Is there anything that I`m missing?