From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix static build link ordering Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:57:59 +0000 Message-ID: <55b009ac-8186-12fe-43b2-b937dc32b8eb@intel.com> References: <1484207214-13638-1-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <6167bd74-c515-fc12-744d-9168a633c646@intel.com> <20170113032155.GA31838@localhost.localdomain> <2563842.f8ghPspXGG@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon , Jerin Jacob Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2563842.f8ghPspXGG@xps13> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 1/13/2017 3:53 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2017-01-13 08:51, Jerin Jacob: >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:27:30PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >>> On 1/12/2017 1:58 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:26:08AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>>>> 2017-01-12 13:16, Jerin Jacob: >>>>>> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB),y) >>>>>> _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD) += -lrte_pmd_ixgbe >>>>>> +endif >>>>> >>>>> _LDLIBS is an internal variable of rte.app.mk. >>>>> Please could you check that there is no issue when using LDLIBS instead >>>>> of _LDLIBS? >>>> >> LDLIBS is not helping the situation as LDLIBS comes before the _LDLIBS-y >> mk/rte.app.mk:LDLIBS += $(_LDLIBS-y) $(CPU_LDLIBS) $(EXTRA_LDLIBS) >> >> But moving to EXTRA_LDLIBS looks OK.But it has to be under CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD >> >> Thomas, Ferruh >> Let me know if you have any objection on below mentioned diff >> >> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB),y) >> -_LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD) += -lrte_pmd_ixgbe >> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD),y) >> +EXTRA_LDLIBS += -lrte_pmd_ixgbe >> endif > > You need to keep the shared lib check. > Anyway, EXTRA_LDLIBS should be reserved to users and not used in a Makefile. > I prefer your initial patch using _LDLIBS. > > Any objection to merge initial proposal? > LDLIBS should be OK, as long as wrapped with SHARED check. Is following not working: -_LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD) += -lrte_pmd_ixgbe +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB),y) +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD),y) +LDLIBS += -lrte_pmd_ixgbe +endif +endif