From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] devargs: add blacklisting by linux
 interface name
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:49:31 +0200
Message-ID: <561CFDDB.90601@6wind.com>
References: <1443798007-20122-1-git-send-email-3chas3@gmail.com>
 <1444058768-9208-1-git-send-email-3chas3@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7A18E89
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:49:37 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <1444058768-9208-1-git-send-email-3chas3@gmail.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi Chas,

On 10/05/2015 05:26 PM, Chas Williams wrote:
> If a system is using deterministic interface names, it may be easier in
> some cases to use the interface name to blacklist an interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>
> ---
>  app/test/test_devargs.c                     |  2 ++
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_devargs.c  |  9 +++++++--
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c  |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_pci.c      | 10 ++++++++--
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_devargs.h |  2 ++
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h     |  1 +
>  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c       | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_devargs.c b/app/test/test_devargs.c
> index f7fc59c..27855ff 100644

> 
> [...]
> 

> @@ -352,6 +354,19 @@ pci_scan_one(const char *dirname, uint16_t domain, uint8_t bus,
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* get network interface name */
> +	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s/net", dirname);
> +	dir = opendir(filename);
> +	if (dir) {
> +		while ((e = readdir(dir)) != NULL) {
> +			if (e->d_name[0] == '.')
> +				continue;
> +
> +			strncpy(dev->name, e->d_name, sizeof(dev->name));
> +		}
> +		closedir(dir);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!ret) {
>  		if (!strcmp(driver, "vfio-pci"))
>  			dev->kdrv = RTE_KDRV_VFIO;
> 

For PCI devices that have several interfaces (I think it's the case for
some Mellanox boards), maybe we should not store the interface name?

Another small comment about the strncpy(): it's maybe safer to ensure
that dev->name is properly nul-terminated.

Regards,
Olivier