From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier MATZ Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethdev: remove the imissed deprecation tag Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:57:41 +0200 Message-ID: <561D0DD5.90706@6wind.com> References: <1443601256-181129-1-git-send-email-maryam.tahhan@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Maryam Tahhan , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A32C91AB for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:57:49 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1443601256-181129-1-git-send-email-maryam.tahhan@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Maryam, On 09/30/2015 10:20 AM, Maryam Tahhan wrote: > Remove the deprecation tag and notice for imissed. > > Signed-off-by: Maryam Tahhan > --- > doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 2 +- > lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 3 +-- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Could you please add some more details about why it is finally kept? I think it could be helpful for people that did not follow the thread http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/6410/ You can also reference the commit id of the patch that introduced the deprecation notice. It could also be a good occasion to remind the definition of imissed: number of packets dropped by hardware because the software does not poll fast enough (= queue full) Thanks! Olivier