From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Duyck Subject: Re: Question about unsupported transceivers Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:34:26 -0700 Message-ID: <561D6AD2.9000308@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Alex Forster , "dev@dpdk.org" Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com (mail-pa0-f43.google.com [209.85.220.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F978D99 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:34:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pabws5 with SMTP id ws5so49524pab.1 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:34:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/13/2015 11:57 AM, Alex Forster wrote: > I believe I've discovered my problem: https://gist.github.com/AlexForster/0fb4699bcdf196cf5462 > > As mentioned previously, I have two X520-Q1 cards installed. It appears that initialization of the first card obeys allow_unsupported_sfp=1, but initialization of the second card does not. > > Is this a bug, or is there a way to work around this that I'm not aware of? > > Alex Forster If you are using Intel's out-of-tree ixgbe driver I believe the module parameters are comma separated with one index per port. So if you have two ports you should be passing "allow_unsupported_sfp=1,1", and for 4 you would need four '1's. - Alex