From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Younghwan Go <yhwan@ndsl.kaist.edu>
Subject: Calling rte_eth_rx_burst() multiple times
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:32:58 +0900
Message-ID: <561F64BA.2000502@ndsl.kaist.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: dev@dpdk.org
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail.ndsl.kaist.edu (www.ndsl.kaist.ac.kr [143.248.57.3])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05657592B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:32:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.ndsl.kaist.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41737C0587
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:32:47 +0900 (KST)
Received: from mail.ndsl.kaist.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (ndsl.kaist.ac.kr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id htYlTwsvW9EW for <dev@dpdk.org>;
 Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:32:46 +0900 (KST)
Received: from [10.0.2.15] (ndsl-pc2.kaist.ac.kr [143.248.129.22])
 by mail.ndsl.kaist.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BFD4C01C8
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:32:45 +0900 (KST)
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi,

I'm pretty new to playing with DPDK. I was trying to see if I can always 
receive MAX_BURST packets by calling rte_eth_rx_burst() multiple times 
on same <port, queue> pair (code shown below). I'm using DPDK-2.1.0 on 2 
dual-port Intel 82599ES 10Gbps NICs with Ubuntu 14.04.3 (kernel 
3.13.0-63-generic).

Since packet processing is slower (~10 Gbps) than pure RX speed (~40 
Gbps), I assumed rte_eth_rx_burst() would always receive some number of 
packets, eventually filling up MAX_BURST. But for multi-core case (4 
CPUs, 4 ports), rte_eth_rx_burst() starts to always return 0 after some 
time, causing all cores to be blocked forever. Analyzing the DPDK code 
(drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c), I'm seeing that inside 
ixgbe_rx_scan_hw_ring() function, "rxdp->wb.upper.status.error" always 
returns 0 (where is this value set by the way?).

I didn't see this problem for single-core case, in which it returned 
MAX_BURST packets at every rte_eth_rx_burst() call. Also, if I break out 
of while loop when I receive 0, I keep receiving packets in next <port, 
queue> pairs. Does anyone know why this block might happen? Or am I not 
allowed to call rte_eth_rx_burst() multiple times on same <port, queue> 
pair if I get 0? Any help will be great! Thank you!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
int cnt = MAX_BURST; // MAX_BURST = 32
int off = 0;
do {
     ret = rte_eth_rx_burst(port_id, queue_id, &m_table[off], cnt);
     if (ret == 0) {
         // don't break out but continue
     } else if (ret > 0) {
         off += ret;
         cnt -= ret;
     }
} while (cnt > 0);
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Best,
Younghwan