From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Panu Matilainen Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:19:24 +0200 Message-ID: <562F257C.9050504@redhat.com> References: <1823202.buTM6Lohp1@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB888D3D for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:19:27 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1823202.buTM6Lohp1@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/26/2015 06:56 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Panu, > Please use --subject-prefix 'PATCH v2' to ease patch management, > as explained here: > http://dpdk.org/dev#send > > git send-email --subject-prefix 'PATCH vX+1' --annotate --cover-letter --in-reply-to > > It should appear on the cover letter and the patches. Oh, I thought I was doing it by the book but apparently not so. Apologies, I'll fix my ways. - Panu -