From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Hunt, David" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/15] Support ARMv7 architecture Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 11:33:18 +0000 Message-ID: <56389B7E.8090703@intel.com> References: <1446508048-16744-1-git-send-email-viktorin@rehivetech.com> <20151103044927.GA4073@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Jerin Jacob , Jan Viktorin Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2B65A76 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:33:21 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20151103044927.GA4073@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 03/11/2015 04:49, Jerin Jacob wrote: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:47:13AM +0100, Jan Viktorin wrote: >> Hello DPDK community, >> >> ARMv7 again, changes: >> >> * removed unnecessary code in the #ifndef RTE_FORCE_INTRINSICS .. #endif (atomic, spinlock, byteorder) >> * more splitting of headers to have 32/64 bit variants (atomic, cpuflags) >> * fixed cpuflags AT_PLATFORM > > Thanks Jan, Dave . > I will rework on the arm64 support based on this version. Jerin, I've got an updated ARMv8 patchset almost ready based on Jan's latest patchset (v6). Will I post it to the list? I suspect that your patchset will be the preferred option for acceptance into DPDK, but there may be one or two snippets of code worth merging together for the final patchset. Rgds, Dave.