From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ethdev: rename macros to have RTE_
	prefix
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:44:54 +0000
Message-ID: <564B3D66.7070300@intel.com>
References: <1447176763-19303-1-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com>
 <1447441090-8129-1-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com>
 <1447441090-8129-2-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39AB5A8C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 15:45:41 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <1447441090-8129-2-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 13/11/15 18:58, Declan Doherty wrote:
> The macros to check that the function pointers and port ids are valid
> for an ethdev are potentially useful to have in a common headers for
> use with all PMDs. However, since they would then become externally
> visible, we apply the RTE_ & RTE_ETH_ prefix to them as approtiate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
>
> ---
>   lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 595 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>   1 file changed, 298 insertions(+), 297 deletions(-)
> <snip>
>

Hey Thomas,

this patch needs to be re-based due to the committal of Daniel's patch 
"ethdev: add ieee1588 functions for device clock time" is it ok to just 
send an updated patch for this single patch as it doesn't effect the 
other 9 patches in the series?

Thanks
Declan