From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Declan Doherty Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/10] mbuf_offload: library to support attaching offloads to a mbuf Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:47:32 +0000 Message-ID: <56533514.4080505@intel.com> References: <1447176763-19303-1-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com> <56530FB1.8000106@6wind.com> <2891112.tEs81Nm6rs@xps13> <57931918.3lc4AAkY5P@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA5F8E90 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:48:48 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <57931918.3lc4AAkY5P@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 23/11/15 14:46, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-11-23 15:17, Thomas Monjalon: >> Yes, it is a totally new work and it probably needs more time to have a >> design working well for most of use cases. >> As I already discussed with Olivier, I think it should be considered as >> experimental. It means we can try it but do not consider it as a stable >> API. So the deprecation process would not apply until the experimental >> flag is removed. > > If nobody complains, I'll apply this v7 and will send a patch to add some > experimental markers. > >> For the release 2.2, it would be better to remove the crypto dependency >> in mbuf. Do you think it is possible? > > Sorry, forget it, the dependency is in mbuf_offload. > That sounds good to me, thanks Thomas!