From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Panu Matilainen Subject: Re: [PATCH] reserve 'make install' for future use Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:48:51 +0200 Message-ID: <565575F3.2000304@redhat.com> References: <1446805454-17776-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20151106125742.GA19512@bricha3-MOBL3> <3464041.Q9de3PmYD6@xps13> <20151124165426.GA18656@bricha3-MOBL3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Bruce Richardson , Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724C0374C for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:48:53 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20151124165426.GA18656@bricha3-MOBL3> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 11/24/2015 06:54 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 02:04:54PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> 2015-11-06 12:57, Bruce Richardson: >>> So, any thoughts or comments on this? There has been lots of discussion in this >>> general area but nothing yet going into the release to try and improve the situation. >>> >>> Are we just going to kick the problem down the road to the 2.3 release? >> >> I plan to check these patches in the coming days for an integration in 2.2. >> > Anything further on this? > Any thoughts from anyone else about this whole area of a saner build/install > system for DPDK and the various patches floating around. Well, it seems we wont have a sane "make install" in 2.2 yet, but this is at least a step in the right direction so +1 from me. - Panu -