From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Neary Subject: Re: 2.3 Roadmap Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:19:11 -0500 Message-ID: <565CCB5F.8030700@redhat.com> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674705F1@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" , "dev@dpdk.org" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110798D95 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 23:19:15 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674705F1@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Tim, Just curious about one item on the list: On 11/30/2015 03:50 PM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote: > IPsec Sample Application: A sample application will be created which will show how DPDK and the new cryptodev API can be used to implement IPsec. Use of the cryptodev API will allow either hardware or software encryption to be used. IKE will not be implemented so the SA/SP DBs will be statically configured. Do you anticipate this application living in the dpdk repo, or in a separate tree? Thanks, Dave. -- Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338