From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Declan Doherty Subject: Re: [PATCH] examples/dpdk_qat: Fix RX queue start number to the one just received the packets Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 08:47:10 +0000 Message-ID: <5665478E.1000200@intel.com> References: <1443524879-24865-1-git-send-email-zhe.tao@intel.com> <1932701.vd3GWY9UVx@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon , Zhe Tao Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C6C958E for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 09:48:23 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1932701.vd3GWY9UVx@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 07/12/15 01:32, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-09-29 19:07, Zhe Tao: >> Every time we started to receive the packets, the start queue number >> should be the one that just received the packets, should not start from zero! >> > [...] >> - for (i = 0; i < qconf->n_rx_queue; i++) { >> + for (i = qconf->rx_curr_queue; i < qconf->n_rx_queue; i++) { > > Anyone to confirm? > I'll have a look at this this morning Thomas.