From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: Add the class_id support in pci probe
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:22:30 +0200
Message-ID: <56964186.1060800@redhat.com>
References: <1451357606-117892-1-git-send-email-ziye.yang@intel.com>
 <20151231091214.0acd9d4e@xeon-e3> <20160113115503.GC7216@bricha3-MOBL3>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681BF379E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:22:33 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <20160113115503.GC7216@bricha3-MOBL3>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 01/13/2016 01:55 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:12:14AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:53:26 +0800
>> Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This patch is used to add the class_id support
>>> for pci_probe since some devices need the class_info
>>> (class_code, subclass_code, programming_interface)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
>>
>> Since rte_pci is exposed to application this breaks the ABI.
>
> But applications are not going to be defining rte_pci_ids values internally, are
> they? That is for drivers to use. Is this really an ABI breakage for applications that we
> need to be concerned about?

There might not be applications using it but drivers are ABI consumers 
too - think of 3rd party drivers and such.

	- Panu -