From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mempool: allow rte_pktmbuf_pool_create
 switch between memool handlers
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:11:46 +0100
Message-ID: <56B47562.5030204@6wind.com>
References: <1453829155-1366-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com>
 <1453829155-1366-6-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC79C136
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  5 Feb 2016 11:11:53 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <1453829155-1366-6-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi David,

On 01/26/2016 06:25 PM, David Hunt wrote:
> if the user wants to have rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() use an external mempool
> handler, they simply define MEMPOOL_HANDLER_NAME to be the name of the
> mempool handler they wish to use. May move this to config

I agree it could move to configuration.


> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> index c18b438..362396e 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> @@ -167,10 +167,21 @@ rte_pktmbuf_pool_create(const char *name, unsigned n,
>  	mbp_priv.mbuf_data_room_size = data_room_size;
>  	mbp_priv.mbuf_priv_size = priv_size;
>  
> +/* #define MEMPOOL_HANDLER_NAME "custom_handler" */
> +#undef MEMPOOL_HANDLER_NAME
> +
> +#ifndef MEMPOOL_HANDLER_NAME
>  	return rte_mempool_create(name, n, elt_size,
>  		cache_size, sizeof(struct rte_pktmbuf_pool_private),
>  		rte_pktmbuf_pool_init, &mbp_priv, rte_pktmbuf_init, NULL,
>  		socket_id, 0);
> +#else
> +	return rte_mempool_create_ext(name, n, elt_size,
> +		cache_size, sizeof(struct rte_pktmbuf_pool_private),
> +		rte_pktmbuf_pool_init, &mbp_priv, rte_pktmbuf_init, NULL,
> +		socket_id, 0,
> +		MEMPOOL_HANDLER_NAME);
> +#endif
>  }

Is it possible to always use rte_mempool_create_ext(), and set
the default handler name to 'ring_mp_mc'?

After checking in rte_mempool_create(), I found the behavior
is different when using xen. Do you know if xen still works with
your patches?

Regards,
Olivier