From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix KNI compilation under Wind River Linux
 6.0 recent RCPLs.
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:17:57 +0200
Message-ID: <56FC5095.9040000@6wind.com>
References: <1459361615-6021-1-git-send-email-lee.roberts@hpe.com>
 <20160330145042.1708ecee@xeon-e3>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, dev@dpdk.org
To: Lee Roberts <lee.roberts@hpe.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1626A5584
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:19:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 20so89552028wmh.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160330145042.1708ecee@xeon-e3>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Le 30/03/2016 23:50, Stephen Hemminger a =E9crit :
> Do we want to require DPDK to work in the face of every weird vendor
> kernel backport. This is a road to nowhere...
+1 with Steve. No way! There is no rational.