From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [RFC] ethdev: make offload name API non-experimental Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:27:23 +0100 Message-ID: <56a9e1c5-3cf7-5f37-a9cf-5bb51290698e@intel.com> References: <20181019173532.19744-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <084d26a0-21d0-4722-001c-9b7b9dfe8cd6@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Stephen Hemminger , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8892965 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:27:25 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <084d26a0-21d0-4722-001c-9b7b9dfe8cd6@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/22/2018 3:39 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 10/19/2018 6:35 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> The offload name functions are useful, but since they are >> marked experimental they can not be used by upstream projects. >> For example, VPP duplicates the same table in its code. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > > +1, they have been added on 18.02, and I think we can remove experimental tag > for them now. Is there any objection to this, if not I am for getting change for rc1?