From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier MATZ Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev, v5, 2/3] app/test: test external mempool handler Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 22:40:51 +0200 Message-ID: <574DF6D3.6050006@6wind.com> References: <1463665501-18325-3-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com> <20160523144530.290b8e97@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> <574D56B5.8040009@intel.com> <20160531141419.12b293f6@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com, pmatilai@redhat.com To: Jan Viktorin , "Hunt, David" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35DC37A8 for ; Tue, 31 May 2016 22:40:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id n184so864727wmn.1 for ; Tue, 31 May 2016 13:40:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160531141419.12b293f6@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, On 05/31/2016 02:14 PM, Jan Viktorin wrote: > On Tue, 31 May 2016 10:17:41 +0100 > "Hunt, David" wrote: >> On 5/23/2016 1:45 PM, Jan Viktorin wrote: >>> The test becomes quite complex. What about having several smaller >>> tests with a clear setup and cleanup steps? >> >> I guess that's something we can look at in the future. For the moment >> can we leave it? > > Yes, just a suggestion. I think, Olivier (maintainer) should request this if needed. Yes, I think we can let it as is for now. But I agree this is something we could enhance. Thanks Olivier