From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: tcpdump support in DPDK 2.3 Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:48:29 +0100 Message-ID: <5764748.1gOFZ9EPCo@xps13> References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC358AF758@smartserver.smartshare.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Morten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= To: Aaron Conole Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70038E7C for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:49:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id n186so52278151wmn.0 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 07:49:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-12-14 10:45, Aaron Conole: > After all, it's a networking stack, right? No, not currently. DPDK allows to build some specific lightweight or more complete stacks.