From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/25] Refactor mlx5 to improve performance
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:44:23 +0100
Message-ID: <57691A87.4000200@intel.com>
References: <1465379291-25310-1-git-send-email-nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
 <1466493818-1877-1-git-send-email-nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
 <20160621074308.GL23111@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>,
 Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F48F5A56
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:44:26 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20160621074308.GL23111@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 6/21/2016 8:43 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Here is an off-topic comment: would you please add following line to
> the sendemail section of your git config file?
>=20
>     chainreplyto =3D false
>=20
> That would let me to break the long threads in my client much easier.
> Otherwise, it's hard for me to do it, leading that your thread occupies
> several screens on my side.
>=20
> It seems that Tetsuya also has the issue, thus CC'ed.
>=20

As far as I can see this is not related to the chainreplyto option, but
"--no-thread" seems set, because all patchsets sent as reply to first
mail of first patchset [C].
Correct setting should be "--thread and --no-chain-reply-to"

Although this is really detail, for multi version patchsets, if there is
a preferred way between (A) or (B) I would like to learn too?

A)

- [0/N]
- - [1/N]
- - [2/N]
- - [v2 0/N]
- - - [v2 1/N]
- - - [v2 N/N]
- - - [v3 0/N]
- - - - [v3 1/N]
- - - - [v3 N/N]
- - - - [v4 0/N]
- - - - - [v4 1/N]
- - - - - [v4 N/N]



B)

- [0/N]
- - [1/N]
- - [2/N]
- - [v2 0/N]
- - - [v2 1/N]
- - - [v2 N/N]
- - [v3 0/N]
- - - [v3 1/N]
- - - [v3 N/N]
- - [v4 0/N]
- - - [v4 1/N]
- - - [v4 N/N]


C)

- [0/N]
- - [1/N]
- - [2/N]
- - [v2 0/N]
- - [v2 1/N]
- - [v2 N/N]
- - [v3 0/N]
- - [v3 1/N]
- - [v3 N/N]