From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: weak functions in some drivers Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:13:15 +0100 Message-ID: <57716CBB.8050609@intel.com> References: <9A518F3E-04B9-4E40-BDDE-B16433A21BF9@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: "Damjan Marion (damarion)" , "dev@dpdk.org" Return-path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455EE56AB for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 20:13:17 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <9A518F3E-04B9-4E40-BDDE-B16433A21BF9@cisco.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 6/21/2016 4:01 PM, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 ... >=20 > What is not clear to me is motivation to use weak here instead of simpl= y using CONFIG_RTE_I40E_INC_VECTOR > macro to exclude stubs in i40e_rxtx.c. It will make library smaller and= avoid issues like this one > which are quite hard to troubleshoot. Since this issue seen in fd.io, I didn't investigated more, but I don't want to clock your valid question, this is an attempt to resurrect the question ... >=20 > BTW Looks like same issue is happening with fm10k driver. >=20