From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: gowrishankar <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] config: enable lpm, port, table, pipeline,
 acl, sched libraries for ppc64le
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 20:08:57 +0530
Message-ID: <57810C81.90807@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <1467860276-22848-1-git-send-email-gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <1467860276-22848-2-git-send-email-gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <2151416.pAYsFeuZ97@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
 Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>, pradeep@us.ibm.com
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com
 [148.163.158.5]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7942935
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat,  9 Jul 2016 16:39:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
 by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id
 u69EdAbi067633 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 9 Jul 2016 10:39:10 -0400
Received: from e28smtp06.in.ibm.com (e28smtp06.in.ibm.com [125.16.236.6])
 by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 242w50xn0p-1
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 10:39:10 -0400
Received: from localhost
 by e28smtp06.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only!
 Violators will be prosecuted
 for <dev@dpdk.org> from <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
 Sat, 9 Jul 2016 20:09:03 +0530
Received: from d28relay03.in.ibm.com (d28relay03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.60])
 by d28dlp01.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0FDE0045
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat,  9 Jul 2016 20:12:58 +0530 (IST)
Received: from d28av03.in.ibm.com (d28av03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.65])
 by d28relay03.in.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
 u69EcxMp60424412 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 9 Jul 2016 20:08:59 +0530
Received: from d28av03.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by d28av03.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id
 u69EcwVn027372 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 9 Jul 2016 20:08:59 +0530
In-Reply-To: <2151416.pAYsFeuZ97@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi Thomas,

On Friday 08 July 2016 06:27 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> The comment and these lines can be removed and rely on default 
> enabling in config/common_base. I suggest to enable (remove disabling) 
> a feature at a time in the patch fixing the feature for PPC. 

Sure. So, do you suggest to send individual patchset (or patch) for each 
feature being enabled, one by one ?.

Thanks,
Gowrishankar