From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linhaifeng Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 18:46:44 +0800 Message-ID: <57FA2014.1020904@huawei.com> References: <1471939839-29778-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Maxime Coquelin To: Yuanhan Liu , Return-path: Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [58.251.152.64]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848475A33 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2016 12:53:33 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1471939839-29778-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" ÔÚ 2016/8/23 16:10, Yuanhan Liu дµÀ: > The basic idea of Tx zero copy is, instead of copying data from the > desc buf, here we let the mbuf reference the desc buf addr directly. Is there problem when push vlan to the mbuf which reference the desc buf addr directly? We know if guest use virtio_net(kernel) maybe skb has no headroom.