From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier MATZ Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] net/virtio: add offload support Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:14:10 +0200 Message-ID: <57FCD792.80504@6wind.com> References: <1475485223-30566-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <20161011113555.GC16751@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, sugesh.chandran@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, jianfeng.tan@intel.com, helin.zhang@intel.com, adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, dprovan@bivio.net, xiao.w.wang@intel.com To: Yuanhan Liu Return-path: Received: from proxy.6wind.com (host.76.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com [62.23.145.76]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AE66CB7 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:14:14 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20161011113555.GC16751@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Yuanhan, On 10/11/2016 01:35 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > Hi, > > Firstly, apologize for so late review. It's been forgotten :( > > BTW, please feel free to ping me in future if I made no response > in one or two weeks! > > I haven't reviewed it carefully yet (something I will do tomorrow). > Before that, few quick questions. > > Firstly, would you write down some test steps? Honestly, I'm not > quite sure how that works without the TCP/IP stack. Not sure I'm getting your question. The test plan described in the cover letter works without any dpdk tcp/ip stack. It uses testpmd, which is able to bridge packets and ask for TCP segmentation. > On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:00:11AM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote: >> This patchset, targetted for 16.11, introduces the support of rx and tx >> offload in virtio pmd. To achieve this, some new mbuf flags must be >> introduced, as discussed in [1]. >> >> It applies on top of: >> - software packet type [2] >> - testpmd enhancements [3] > > I didn't do the search. Have the two got merged? As of now, it's not merged yet. I think Thomas is on it. Regards, Olivier