From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: fix shallow copy of flow API RAW item Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 16:25:15 +0200 Message-ID: <58726116.gJB1vlhU96@xps> References: <20180516154052.16836-1-adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> <20180516154052.16836-2-adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> <465390c3-5aa9-e015-52bd-cec695d84c4c@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: Ferruh Yigit , dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, Qi Zhang To: Adrien Mazarguil Return-path: In-Reply-To: <465390c3-5aa9-e015-52bd-cec695d84c4c@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 18/05/2018 19:06, Ferruh Yigit: > On 5/16/2018 4:41 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote: > > Like original commit mentioned below, this fix synchronizes flow rule copy > > function with testpmd's own implementation following "app/testpmd: fix copy > > of raw flow item (revisited)". > > > > Fixes: d0ad8648b1c5 ("ethdev: fix shallow copy of flow API RSS action") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Cc: Qi Zhang > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil > > Hi Thomas, > > What do you suggest about this one? > Scope is limited to rte_flow but still many features are now relies on rte_flow, > what is your comment on getting this in rc5? We need to know exactly what is broken. If nothing serious, it can wait 18.08. Adrien, please can you describe the use case, the issue and the impact?