From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] remove double parenthesis
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 22:09:28 +0100
Message-ID: <5948881.4ayu02MO7x@xps>
References: <20171214233221.30928-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC391B00B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  5 Jan 2018 22:09:50 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <20171214233221.30928-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

15/12/2017 00:32, Stephen Hemminger:
> Noticed in ethdev an obvious case of extra parenthesis so
> went hunting for others as well. There seems to be some weird
> coding standard that loves extra parenthesis (or developers
> don't understand basic C precedence rules).
> 
> Stephen Hemminger (5):
>   bnx2x: remove (redundant) parenthesis
>   kni: remove (redundant) parenthesis
>   ethdev: remove (redundant) parenthesis
>   distributor: remove (unnecessary) parenthesis
>   loadbalancer: remove (unnecessary) parenthesis

Applied, thanks