From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mk: parallelize make config
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:50:27 +0000
Message-ID: <5C15197B-7CD8-490D-B756-B0580CBFFA50@intel.com>
References: <20170122015034.19824-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
 <20170123181813.00567e47@platinum>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AD82BE9
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:50:29 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <20170123181813.00567e47@platinum>
Content-Language: en-US
Content-ID: <5FB4B0766F5F0A458503C6DDC7E570A2@intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>


> On Jan 23, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> wrote=
:
>=20
> Hi Ferruh,
>=20
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 01:50:34 +0000, Ferruh Yigit
> <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
>> make config dependency resolving was always running serial,
>> parallelize it for better performance.
>>=20
>> $ time make T=3Dx86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc config
>> real    0m12.633s
>>=20
>> $ time make -j8 T=3Dx86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc config
>> real    0m1.826s
>>=20
>> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>=20
> I have a patch that fix the same issue (configuration takes to long),
> but done differently. It is more intrusive, since it rework the way
> DEPDIRS are used, but it does not require to use -j.

I tested the patch and the performance is very quick and seems to work very=
 nicely. I have not looked at the other patch yet are they both compatible =
and could be combined or not?

>=20
> I'm sending it as a reply to this thread.
>=20
> Regards,
> Olivier

Regards,
Keith