From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5975CD4F54 for ; Wed, 27 May 2026 09:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF9140285; Wed, 27 May 2026 11:54:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from canpmsgout07.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout07.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.222]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4584026C for ; Wed, 27 May 2026 11:54:18 +0200 (CEST) dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=h-partners.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=7a/i3qYuzU3i9aatCzOP7mip8hS+4KNzp9Ojo1LksxU=; b=oOA74eUS4Zcb5T9ry2/LgsxuBy23HdKvZuF8e6/W19fGLzBax61+xPatKE/EoLSF4kU2bJkr2 sj8w3snDOwJt6PA7FJ0eg3ujApQlRZ1QxscGEB422AO4ZlJ+M++482YooAZNm3+pmAxAZiJZanE kHrdk/GM3wgXb7kxbZeIx0g= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.214]) by canpmsgout07.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4gQPs20r7BzLlT6; Wed, 27 May 2026 17:46:30 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggemv705-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [10.3.19.32]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6802E4056F; Wed, 27 May 2026 17:54:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemn100009.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.112) by dggemv705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Wed, 27 May 2026 17:54:13 +0800 Received: from [10.67.121.59] (10.67.121.59) by kwepemn100009.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.36; Wed, 27 May 2026 17:54:12 +0800 Message-ID: <5d303b47-aae9-4e0c-ba6c-e1d5ab607f74@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 17:54:11 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/15] power: unify and improve lcore ID verification To: Stephen Hemminger CC: , , , , , , References: <20260416030612.2379407-1-lihuisong@huawei.com> <20260507024230.1198111-1-lihuisong@huawei.com> <20260518105954.2309f802@phoenix.local> <20260526121813.0e15163e@phoenix.local> From: "lihuisong (C)" In-Reply-To: <20260526121813.0e15163e@phoenix.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.121.59] X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems500002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.17) To kwepemn100009.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.112) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 5/27/2026 3:18 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 19 May 2026 21:09:47 +0800 > "lihuisong (C)" wrote: > >> Thanks for giving me this AI review feedback. >> Some of them are still acceptable. will fix it in next version. >> >> Is this summary from AI generated for each patche series? >> May ask where you obtained this information about AI review? > There is automated review from CI which is done after CI tests runs pass. > But it is using older version of AGENTS.md and missing tool skills support. > I use Claude AI project with current version of AGENTS.md. > It gives the best reviews since it is willing to go look at the existing code. > Other methods just look at the patch itself. Got it. Thanks for your AI review.