From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/6] ethdev: add Tx preparation Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 17:26:18 +0100 Message-ID: <6019452.hetlqJUqAU@xps13> References: <1477486575-25148-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com> <1479922585-8640-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com> <1479922585-8640-2-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com To: Tomasz Kulasek Return-path: Received: from mail-wj0-f169.google.com (mail-wj0-f169.google.com [209.85.210.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D475598 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:26:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v7so209144472wjy.2 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 08:26:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1479922585-8640-2-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-11-23 18:36, Tomasz Kulasek: > Added fields to the `struct rte_eth_desc_lim`: > > uint16_t nb_seg_max; > /**< Max number of segments per whole packet. */ > > uint16_t nb_mtu_seg_max; > /**< Max number of segments per one MTU */ How (and when) an application is supposed to use these fields? Is it useful to expose them if we make tx_prepare() mandatory?