From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: add supported hash function
	check
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:15:04 +0200
Message-ID: <6024675.SqA4AgUrAM@xps>
References: <20180409121035.148813-1-xuemingl@mellanox.com>
 <38100809.DTC8XynbX7@xps>
 <VI1PR05MB1678D2ABA89F6E997A46C073ACB60@VI1PR05MB1678.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
 Nelio Laranjeiro <notifications@github.com>, Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
 Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: "Xueming(Steven) Li" <xuemingl@mellanox.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E808D90
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:15:07 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR05MB1678D2ABA89F6E997A46C073ACB60@VI1PR05MB1678.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

18/04/2018 13:55, Xueming(Steven) Li:
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > 17/04/2018 16:24, Xueming Li:
> > > +	/* Check that device supports requested rss hash functions. */
> > > +	if ((dev_info.flow_type_rss_offloads |
> > > +	     dev_conf->rx_adv_conf.rss_conf.rss_hf) !=
> > > +	    dev_info.flow_type_rss_offloads) {
> > > +		RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%d invalid rss_hf: 0x%lx, valid value: 0x%lx\n",
> > > +				    port_id,
> > > +				    dev_conf->rx_adv_conf.rss_conf.rss_hf,
> > > +				    dev_info.flow_type_rss_offloads);
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +	}
> > 
> > Please use PRIx64 and test 32-bit compilation.
> > 
> > Reminder from this recent post:
> > 
> > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdpdk.org%2Fml%2Farchives%2Fdev%2F201
> > 8-
> > February%2F090882.html&data=02%7C01%7Cxuemingl%40mellanox.com%7C5508bc716aac41b932fb08d5a4aeb241%7Ca65
> > 2971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636595992591300475&sdata=1hirZ1j7VqCMnrzngZFAuQj42OACfxFUgYgzy
> > VQyw%2F4%3D&reserved=0
> > "
> > Most of the times, using %l is wrong (except when printing a long).
> > So next time you write %l, please think "I am probably wrong".
> > "
> 
> Thanks, got following warning from checkpatch when applying this rule to my other patchset, is it normal?
>   CHECK:CAMELCASE: Avoid CamelCase: <PRIx64>
>   #49: FILE: drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c:2083:
>   +               " hash:%" PRIx64 "/%u specs:%hhu(%hu), priority:%hu, type:%d,"
> 

Yes it is "normal".
Something we should fix in checkpatch.