From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Jastrzebski, MichalX K" <michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] doc: update release 2.2 after changes
 in librte_lpm
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:33:30 +0000
Message-ID: <60ABE07DBB3A454EB7FAD707B4BB1582139CA6A2@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1445608311-8092-1-git-send-email-michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>
 <1445608311-8092-4-git-send-email-michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>
 <20151023142142.GA26964@bricha3-MOBL3>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
To: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD605921
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:33:37 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20151023142142.GA26964@bricha3-MOBL3>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 4:22 PM
> To: Jastrzebski, MichalX K
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/3] doc: update release 2.2 after chan=
ges
> in librte_lpm
>=20
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 03:51:51PM +0200, Michal Jastrzebski wrote:
> > From: Michal Kobylinski <michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Kobylinski <michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>
>=20
> Hi Michal,
>=20
> for when you do your v2, this doc update should be included in with the
> relevant
> changes i.e. in patch 1, not as a separate doc patch.
>=20
> /Bruce

Thanks Bruce, we will do that.=20
The reason it is separated now is that 1st patch is extremely big and diffi=
cult to review.
I wonder if in v2 we could move changes related with test application to th=
e second patch?
This will cause of course that without applying whole patch-set dpdk won't =
compile.

> > ---
> >  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_2.rst | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_2.rst
> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_2.rst
> > index ab1c25f..3c616ab 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_2.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_2.rst
> > @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ ABI Changes
> >
> >  * librte_cfgfile: Allow longer names and values by increasing the cons=
tants
> >    CFG_NAME_LEN and CFG_VALUE_LEN to 64 and 256 respectively.
> > +
> > +* librte_lpm: Increase number of next hops for IPv4 to 2^24
> >
> >
> >  Shared Library Versions
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >