From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] doc: Corrected info for tx_checksum set mask function, in testpmd UG Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:41:23 +0100 Message-ID: <6181232.LMYj4iiz8q@xps13> References: <1416078796-689-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> <5469D061.8050805@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" Hi Pablo, 2014-11-17 10:47, De Lara Guarch, Pablo: > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ > > On 11/15/2014 08:13 PM, Pablo de Lara wrote: > > > tx_checksum set mask function now allows 4 extra bits in the mask > > > for TX checksum offload > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara > > > --- > > > doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 10 +++++++++- > > > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > A patch reworking the csumonly API is pending: > > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/008188.html > > > > I don't know if it will be accepted, but just to mention that > > these 2 patches will conflict in this case. > > Thanks for spotting it! I guess that at this point, all we can do is wait. > If you patch gets applied before mine, I will send a v2 with the changes. > If it gets applied after, then I will send another patch to fix it. Oliver will send a v4 of his TSO patchset which should be applied shortly. Please could you adjust the documentation and make a v2? Bernard, we have to wait for this change. Thanks to all -- Thomas